This page is reserved for commentary on timely topics—including religion, politics and societal trends— with special emphasis on Essential Value and Individual Freedom.  Respond to:

While this may not be the most appropriate topic for Thanksgiving week, it could lead to a long-awaited ruling that we can all be thankful for.  Attorney General Jeff Sessions has indicated that a special counsel may be appointed to investigate potential wrongdoing by the Clinton Foundationspecifically the sale of Uranium One, a Canadian company with mining interests in the U.S., to Russia’s nuclear energy agency Rosatom.  The sale occurred in stages, beginning in 2009 when Rosatom purchased a minority stake in Uranium One, and continued through 2013 when it acquired full ownership of this company.  Rosatom now controls roughly 20% of uranium production capacity in the U.S.

It has been known for almost a year that the DNC hired a former British intelligence officer named Christopher Steele, a subcontractor for the Washington research firm of Fusion GPS, to compile a secret dossier on Donald Trump and Russia.  Does that contract implicate Hillary Clinton for helping the Russians obtain American uranium?  And what about the fact that current licenses issued to Rosatom’s U.S. subsidiaries by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission prohibit the exportation of uranium outside the country?  The sale of uranium is also subject to approval by the Committee on Foreign Investment which includes input from the Departments of State, Treasury, Justice, Energy, Defense, Commerce and Homeland Security, as well as the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative.  

Controversy surrounding the deal largely pertains to Hillary Clinton, who was Secretary of State in 2010 when the State Department signed off on Rosatom’s purchase of Uranium One.  Several of Uranium One’s owners were also donors to the Clinton Foundation, giving $145 million to the charitable foundation, and critics have alleged that Clinton greenlighted the sale to appease donors to her family’s charity.  The allegations surfaced in October, when The Hill reported that the FBI was investigating Kremlin “bribery, kickbacks, extortion and money laundering designed to grow Vladimir Putin’s atomic energy business inside the United States.”

How can Americans have confidence in the outcome of the Trump-Russia matter if the integrity and impartiality of Mueller and Rosenstein have been compromised by their suspected cover-up of the Clinton-Russia case?  Both men should resign and a new special counsel appointedthis time to investigate Hillary Clinton, not Donald Trump.  This week, Investor's Business Daily explores the need to investigate the case for legal action in the Clinton Foundation's Uranium One scandal.  If you believe Hillary Clinton's engineering of this deal was criminal, if not actually treason, let us know at



                                                                                                                            HAVE  A  SAFE  AND  HAPPY  THANKSGIVING!                                               






Will Justice Investigate Hillary Clinton's Crimes In Uranium One-Fusion GPS Scandal?

It Should

by   Investor's Business Daily*   [Posted 11/15/17]


A New York Times headline says it all: "Justice Dept. to Weigh Inquiry Into Clinton Foundation."  Yes, the pressure is growing to fully investigate Bill and Hillary Clinton for their many questionable activities tied to their charitable foundation and to Fusion GPS, the creator of the largely bogus Trump dossier.  Given the mountains of evidence of possible criminal wrongdoing, it's about time.

On Oct. 24 the Washington Post, of all publications, reported that the Hillary Clinton presidential campaign and the Democratic National Committee paid the opposition-research firm Fusion GPS to dig up all the dirt it could find on Donald Trump.

As we notd last month, beginning in April 2016, a Clinton attorney, Mark Elias of Seattle-based Perkins Coie, paid Fusion GPS for the opposition Trump research.  For the record, Elias worked with former White House Counsel Robert Bauer, who was also a partner at Perkins-Coie, known for its Democratic Party ties.

From June 2015 to December 2016, Perkins Coie took in $5.4 million from the DNC and a whopping $12.4 million from the Clinton campaign as "legal fees."  Perkins Coie's Elias secretly paid Fusion GPS for its "research" from the legal fees that Hillary Clinton and the DNC forked over.

Funded to the hilt, Fusion GPS hired a former British spy named Christopher Steele, who previously headed British intelligence agency MI-6's Russian desk, ultimately paying him $168,000.  Using his many Russian contacts, Steele put together a Trump dossier filled with rumors, innuendos and some outright liesthe kind of thing that could be incredibly damaging to Trump in a last-minute campaign blitz.

All of this is bad enough.  None of it was disclosed in Federal Election Commission filings as required by law, so there is a very sound basis for legal action.

And somehow the dubious dossier made its way into the hands of both the media and the FBI, raising the obvious question: Did the FBI use essentially a political document funded by the Democrats to seek special surveillance from the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court on officials in the Trump campaign?  Is that what started the whole "Trump collusion with Russia" ball rolling?  If so, it's likely a major crime has been committed, one that would dwarf Watergate in its dimensions.

But it goes even deeper than that.

While the media shriek about the Trump campaign's alleged Russia ties, the Democratic Party in general and the Clinton campaign in specific had very clear links to nefarious Russian figures, both inside and outside of  Vladimir Putin's government.

Going back to the very beginnings of the Obama administration, Russian leader Vladimir Putin made extraordinary efforts to get a dominant foothold in the U.S. nuclear industry.  Using the Russian state-owned nuclear monopoly Rosatom, Putin engaged in a campaign of "bribery, extortion, (and) money laundering" in his efforts to acquire Uranium One, a Canadian-based nuclear materials company that controls 20% of all U.S. domestic uranium supplies, according to Chuck Grassley, chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee.

Obama's Justice Department, then under Eric Holder, knew about this but did nothing about it.  And, despite knowing about Russia's illegal activities, when the Rosatom bid to take over Uranium One came up for a vote, the U.S. Committee on Foreign Investment (CFIUS) approved it in 2010.  Then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, a member of the CFIUS board, voted in favor of the deal.   So did Holder.

If that sounds funny, it should.  Because it turns out that the Clinton Foundation, the global "charity" run by Bill and Hillary, had taken in an estimated $145 million from Uranium One shareholders and executives, mostly around the time the deal was being approved.

The Justice Department waited until 2014, after Hillary's departure from office, to do anything about the Russian criminal activity.  And details of the Uranium One deal didn't even emerge until 2015, after Holder left office.

It reeks of quid-pro-quo double-dealing that involved Clinton using her powerful office of secretary of state to enrich her own private foundation and family.  Americans may be starting to come around to the idea that something very bad happened.

Our own IBD/TIPP Poll released earlier this month shows that, among those who are closely following the uranium deal, some 59% believe that "Russian donations to the Clinton Foundation played a role in the previous administration's decision to approve the (Uranium One) deal" with Russia.

And 54% said they agreed either "strongly" or "somewhat" that SpecialCounsel Robert Mueller "has a conflict of interest (in investigating Russian meddling in the 2016 election) since he was the FBI director at the time of the 2010 uranium deal."

We began saying way back in 2016 that this entire affair deserved to be investigated.  Last year, the FBI, under then-Director James Comey, made it known it was doing just that, though there has been no further comment.

Based on what has been revealed, it's time for the Justice Department to step up.  We continue to believe that a special counsel or federal prosecutor needs to be appointed to see if members of the Obama administrationin particular former Secretary of State Hillary Clintonwere guilty of high crimes and misdemeanors in their dubious dealing with the Russians.

*Investor's Business Daily (IBD), founded in 1984 by William O'Neill as a print news publication, is a media company covering international business, finance, economics, and the stock market.  This commentary was posted on Wednesday, November 15, 2017 @Investor's Business Daily, Inc.




Did  you  miss  these  recent  EV   articles?   Read  or  print  them  now . . .

  Acknowledging a Universe by Design

Trying to Quantify Reality

 The Essence of Our Reality

  Confessions of a Moral Relativist

  Deciphering the Master Plan

  The Welfare State vs. Values and the Mind

  Do Americans Still Value Freedom?

  Vive la Différence!

  Empires Also Die

  Individualism in Philosophy

  The Stupidity of Attacking ID

  The Great Utopia

  Is 'Discrimination' a Bad Word?

  The Failure of Socialism

  Is there Life after Death?

  The Moral Basis of Capitalism

  Your Self as a Value Detector

  On Becoming Aware

  Pondering Pure Nothingness

  Crime and Punishment

  The Curse of Misplaced Altruism

  The Axiology of Essential Value

  Religion Invalidates Freedom

  Value is the Essence of Life

  A Critical Look at the Koran

  What Islam Needs Now

  The Free Will Defense

  Consciousness and Reality 

  From Nothingness to Value Realized

  Values Affirm what Essence Negates


Amazon e-Books: Seizing The Essence