Javascript DHTML Tree Menu Powered by dhtml

W e have talked before on this page about the failure of socialism throughout history. (Read

Jack Swift's excellent essay on this topic archived below.) Last week three European nations voted to choose their leaders. French citizens handed the presidency to leftist Francois Hollande, a champion of government stimulus who says the state should protect the downtrodden. It was a victory that could deal a death blow to the drive for austerity that has drained most of Europe in recent years. Greek voters delivered a stinging rejection of the two incumbent parties, while in Germany, incumbent Angela Merkel’s conservative party also suffered minor setbacks.

Mssr. Hollande campaigned against a German agreement that called for sharp budget cuts in euro nations. Although he promised to support deficit reduction, as Obama has in the U.S., Hollande proposed a 75 percent tax rate on incomes above 1 million euros—a "Gallic version of the Buffet rule," according to one reporter. He also proposed hiring more teachers and police officers and a tax on financial transactions—initiatives many Democrats support but Congress has blocked. Analysts noted that Hollande's proposals were too extreme for U.S. voters; yet in a recent Gallup Poll, 60 percent of them supported a minimum tax rate of 30 percent on earnings of $1 million or more. And 57 percent believe the distribution of wealth in the United States is not "fair".

What most Americans don't realize, however, is that the need for austerity will soon affect their life-style as well. For the economic reality is that no government can provide everything without robbing Peter to pay Paul. What Paul loses is the freedom and incentive to pursue a productive career that would advance his social status. Such is the tragedy of the socialist welfare state that the Obama administration likes to call "moving America forward."

To explain what these political events mean in valuistic terms, we've turned to the investment community for this week's column. David Galland is an economics professor from Florida who well understands the plight of people who, faced with the need for austerity, choose socialism as a default position. He has been quoted pointing out that "Trading our freedoms for security is a bad decision because, in the end, the nation will be neither free nor secure." Although Professor Galland's commentary was posted on the eve of the French election, its message for Americans is clear and to the point. We would appreciate your reaction to this insightful report. Send your comments to hampday1@verizon.net.

----HP

★★★★ NEXT WEEK: DO AMERICANS REALLY WANT A SOCIALIST STATE? ★★★★

This page is reserved for commentary on timely topics, including religion, politics, and societal trends, with

special emphasis on Essential Value and Individual Freedom.   E-mail responses to:   hampday1@verizon.net.

Is an Economic Deluge Nigh?

by David Galland*   [Posted 5/05/12]

If history has taught one certain lesson, it is that the less fettered an economy, the better humankind is able to do what it does best: run from trouble and run toward opportunity. In this way mistakes are quickly resolved and progress assured.

Conversely, the deeper the muck of regulation, mandates, taxes, subsidies and other bureaucratic meddling, the slower we humans are in following our natural instincts until the point that progress is slowed or even stopped.

It is said that history doesn’t repeat itself, but it often rhymes. In the current circumstances, it appears that enough time has passed that current generations have completely forgotten the critical connection between the ability of humans to freely pursue their aspirations and economic progress.

You can see this ignorance in the popular demand for even more, not less, meddling in the affairs of humankind. Should this trend continue—and for reasons I will touch on momentarily, I firmly believe it will—then the aspirations of the productive minority will soon be dampened by ever higher taxes and other attempts to “level the playing field” and the global economy, already in tatters, will fall off the edge.

There is no more timely nor acute example of this growing trend than what is currently going on in France. I refer, of course, to the first round of the presidential election process, scheduled for this weekend.

In France, if no candidate attracts no better than 50% of the vote, then the two leading candidates go to a decisive runoff vote, this time around to be held on May 6.

The [defeated] president, Nicolas Sarkozy, a conservative in name only, was running at a fairly steady gait toward re-election (thanks to the head start awarded all incumbents), when leading socialist candidate Francois Hollande came out with a proposal to tax anyone with an annual income of over one million euros at a rate of 75%. He also promised to add a tax on all financial transactions and increase taxes on France’s biggest companies to 35%—securing bragging rights as levying the world’s third-highest corporate taxes, the US being #1. This all on top of a 25% VAT, one of the world’s highest. By some calculations, the result of Hollande’s new taxes is that effectively 100% of all incomes over one million euros will now be stripped away by the state.

For good measure, Hollande also promised to reverse the recent modest increase in retirement age from 60 to 62 pushed through by Sarkozy. While I am sure it is mere coincidence, I found it noteworthy that Mssr. Hollande’s campaign slogan is “Change—Now!”

Remarkably, at least for those with some small understanding of economics, as a result of leaning into the microphone with these proposals Hollande has galloped ahead of all other potential contenders and is now projected to finish nose by nose with Sarkozy.

After which the also-rans will be removed from the race, freeing their supporters to share their affections elsewhere. Given that the leading contender for third place with an estimated 14% of the vote is one Jean-Luc Mélenchon—charitably categorized as “far left”, a label that can be applied to most of the other candidates—it is projected that the “conservative” Mssr. Sarkozy will go down in double-digit flames come May 6.

Bringing to mind the prophetic utterance of Louis XV: “Après moi, le déluge.”

The deluge in Louis’ case manifested as the murderous affair commonly known as the French Revolution. In the case of Mssr. Hollande taking up residence in the Palais de l’Élysée, the deluge is likely to manifest in the form of rising interest rates as investors look to protect against an acceleration in the country’s debt to GDP ratio, already projected to hit almost 90% this year, exacerbated by a flight of capital, investors, entrepreneurs and large businesses.

As is the nature of such things, because of the aforementioned predilection of humans to run from trouble, we likely won’t have to wait for Mssr. Hollande to be formally enshrined in the gilded halls for the trouble to start—it will begin within days and maybe even minutes of the handicappers concluding that his ascendency is a sure thing.

Given that France is the third-largest economy in the already-troubled Eurozone, one can expect the deluge to spread, with potentially devastating consequences. That the guillotines may soon be rolled out across Europe can be better understood by taking into account that the Eurozone sovereign deadbeats are on the hook for roughly nine trillion euros in debt, some significant percentage of which has to be rolled over to ready buyers over the next couple of years. Adding weight to the problem is that, according to the latest figures out of the IMF, Europe‘s banks may have to sell off up to 3.8 trillion euros in assets, many of them questionable, between now and the end of next year. At least, if they want to remain solvent.

Across the pond, the United States also has aggressive funding needs, given that the “change” we experienced ourselves in the last presidential election has left the government gasping for about $1.4 trillion in additional funding each year. Then there is Japan, officially the world‘s largest debtor in terms of debt to GDP, where the easy availability of local funding has dried up, requiring that nation to go to the international markets for funding as well.

The phrase “an awful lot of hogs at the trough” comes to mind.

My point is not just that these governments are broke and are about to get a lot more broke as interest rates rise on their many debts and financings, but rather that the global trend toward a resurgence in public demand for socialism in response to a worsening crisis is a certainty.

How could it be otherwise when for decades now the schooling of children has been delegated to functionaries of the state?

For evidence, look no further than the quote from an essay by a college student in the United States on role the government should play:

"As human beings, we are not really responsible for our own acts, and so we need government to control those who don't care about others."
The writer of those words was a member of a Valencia University economics class. The professor, Jack Chandliss, asked the class to write an essay on what the American dream means to them, and what they want the federal government to do to help them achieve that dream. Out of 180 students participating, only about 10% wanted the government to leave them alone and not tax them too much, but a whopping 80% wanted the government to provide pretty much the whole dream thing wrapped in a tidy bow—including free college tuition and health care, jobs, even the down payment on their future homes, money for retirement and hard cash, taken in the form of taxes from rich people.

Pretty eye-opening, eh?
The point here is not complex, but it is important.

With the apparatus of state education over many years serving to bamboozle the populace into the hardened belief that government has a positive role to play in virtually all aspects of modern life, it should come as no surprise to anyone that, when push comes to shove, people are now trained to look to government to solve the problems – even when it was the government that created the problems in the first place.

Thus, confronted with the intractable mess they have made, these governments have to keep alive the mythology they have created about their omnipotence. Which is easier said than done, because with things now swirling fairly quickly around the drain, the mob is beginning to lose faith—and even patience.

Which puts these governments in a very tight spot, because the only way they can actually fix things is by doing exactly the opposite of what people have come to expect from their governments, which is always to do more. Put simply, the only hope now is that these governments begin to reduce their roles in their respective economies, and dramatically so. Concurrently, they have to encourage people in their aspirations to greater wealth, by lowering their taxes and unwinding the tangle of regulations they have created over the last half-century.

But if the governments actually tried to take these actions, the brainwashed masses would be positively befuddled then outraged, as it goes against everything they have been taught. Why, it would be like the Pope shuffling his way to the balcony of St. Peter’s Basilica and informing the doting faithful that there isn’t a god and never has been.
Riots would follow.
So it is that we find ourselves at a particularly interesting juncture in the historical record.

On the one hand you have a majority of the world’s population who have been carefully schooled into believing that the institution of government holds the solution to all problems and is the source of succor to all who need it. (Even that subset of the populace who has lost confidence in their current government invariably believes as doctrine that the next and better government can change things for the better and lead the way to the shining castle on the hill.)

In this mix are the politicians and their functionaries, 99.99% of whom believe that, if for no other reason than their re-election prospects, they have to do something to meet the demands of the public.

Of course, under normal circumstances the “something” usually consists of making grand-sounding speeches and otherwise blowing smoke. Today that’s just not going to cut it, for the simple reason that the crisis is real, it is spinning out of control, and it’s not going to go away unless and until the markets are allowed to breathe again.
Which brings us full circle to the simple truth that the brainwashed public won’t stand idly by while the politicians lower taxes and regulations on the profit makers or cut back state pensions and guarantees or otherwise reduce any of the many services the state has taken on itself to provide.
“Between a rock and a hard place” is an inadequate phrase to describe the situation.

Meanwhile, the mob has started to gather, their dark mutterings heard by the politicos who quickly don the red caps themselves, the better to be viewed as one with the people and join in expressing outrage against the capitalists who have been selected as fall guys in this unfolding drama.
When confronted by reporters about the fact that his 75% tax on high-income owners would raise nowhere enough revenue to offset France’s towering debt and social obligations, Mssr. Hollande was heard to respond:
“It’s not a question of return. It’s a question of morality.”

When coercion and theft are considered moral, anything is possible, and none of it good.

While I certainly can’t say how this is all going to end, I’m pretty sure it’s not going to end well.

*David Galland is the Managing Director of Casey Research, a former professor of economics, and a founding partner of EverBank. He has worked on various financial newsletters and is currently managing editor for Doug Casey’s International Speculator. This commentary was posted to ContraryInvesting.com on Sunday, May 6, 2012.



Did you miss these recent EV articles?   Read or print them now . . .



✔ Acknowledging a Universe by Design                    ✔   Mind over Matter

✔ Have we lost our Core Belief?                        ✔ Confessions of a Moral Relativist

✔ Is God Unconstitutional?                                            ✔   The Welfare State vs. Values and the Mind

✔   Do Americans Still Value Freedom?              ✔ Vive la Différence !

✔ Empires Also Die                                                          ✔   Individualism in Philosophy

✔ The Stupidity of Attacking ID                               ✔ The Great Utopia

✔ Is 'Discrimination' a Bad Word?                             ✔ The Failure of Socialism

✔ A New Theory of the Universe                            ✔   The Moral Basis of Capitalism

✔ Your Self as a Value Detector                   ✔ The Problem of Hiddenness

✔   Dealing with Antagonists                                    ✔   Crime and Punishment

✔ The Curse of Misplaced Altruism                       ✔ Metaphysics and the Problem of Existence

✔ The Autonomous Choicemaker                          ✔ Value: the Essence of Experience

✔ Aesthetic Arguments for God                              ✔ Multicultural Madness

✔ Getting beyond Otherness                                    ✔   Are we living in a Moral Stone Age?

✔ The Chasm that Divides the World                    ✔ Value Affirms what Essence Negates

✔ GET SEIZING THE ESSENCE HERE NOW ! _➱ http://www2.xlibris.com/bookstore/

    TO HOME PAGE                                                                       TO FORUM PAGE